<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagging With F-Spot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>No it is correct that f-spot does not support semi-sophisticated boolean combinations of the tag. However as f-spot is still in rapid development and since such a feature is relatively straighforward to implement I am not too worried about this. Actually a patch to do just this is already attached to &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139796&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bug # 139796&lt;/a&gt; and it is mentioned in the over view of &lt;a href=&quot;http://f-spot.org/New_Features&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Features&lt;/a&gt; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is correct that f-spot does not support semi-sophisticated boolean combinations of the tag. However as f-spot is still in rapid development and since such a feature is relatively straighforward to implement I am not too worried about this. Actually a patch to do just this is already attached to <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139796" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139796&amp;referer=');">bug # 139796</a> and it is mentioned in the over view of <a href="http://f-spot.org/New_Features" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/f-spot.org/New_Features?referer=');">New Features</a> too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gooboo</title>
		<link>http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>gooboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Well, I started the same process. However, I discovered half-way through that F-Spot does not seem to support finding images with multiple tags (i.e. give me all images with tag A AND tag B, not OR). Or perhaps it does... any ideas?

GB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I started the same process. However, I discovered half-way through that F-Spot does not seem to support finding images with multiple tags (i.e. give me all images with tag A AND tag B, not OR). Or perhaps it does&#8230; any ideas?</p>
<p>GB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moelhave.dk/2006/04/tagging-with-f-spot/#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Good idea about tagging your photos!  I wish I had done so with mine... :-)
As for the hosting, then I&#039;ve always hosted my ~10 GiB photos on my own machine since it seemed impossible/difficult to find a webhost that would allow me to upload that amount of data.  There are some webhosts that claim to give you free space, but in their detailed terms and conditions they always write something like &quot;free space means up to 5 GiB&quot;...  But I guess that would be enough for you the first year or so... and if you don&#039;t upload each and every photo, then it should last significantly longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea about tagging your photos!  I wish I had done so with mine&#8230; :-)<br />
As for the hosting, then I&#8217;ve always hosted my ~10 GiB photos on my own machine since it seemed impossible/difficult to find a webhost that would allow me to upload that amount of data.  There are some webhosts that claim to give you free space, but in their detailed terms and conditions they always write something like &#8220;free space means up to 5 GiB&#8221;&#8230;  But I guess that would be enough for you the first year or so&#8230; and if you don&#8217;t upload each and every photo, then it should last significantly longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

